Category Archives: Uncategorized
Weekly Summary July 29
I am way behind on book reports, but have read lots of good things in the past couple months. I do plan to write them up. Links Via zanzjan, the stats behind redshirt deaths on Star Trek. The chart is … Continue reading
Google Reader Plugin Update
If you are using the plugin to add Google Reader Shared Items to your sidebar, you need to update it to account for recent changes in Google Reader. Either download the new version, or make this simple change: On line … Continue reading
Weekly Summaries March 11
Warning: This post is all about me — no links this week. Sorry. (Go watch more hockey fights if you're bored.) Updated my exceedingly boring nonfiction site with some of the FrameMaker stuff I was playing around with recently. I … Continue reading
Weekly Summaries Feb. 18
Links: •Links to various free SF sites Shameless self-promotion: •How to format a manuscript for an online critique group. Writing Summary: Goals for the week: Finish unstickynoting ch 11-15 – maybe half? Go over the notebook notes for ch 4-10 … Continue reading
Weekly Summaries Feb. 12
Links: • (Humor) Helpful advice in the event of terrorist attacks. I like the one with the blaring radio. • Via anghara, daily diversions for writers (comics) • How to Move Posts from LiveJournal to WordPress is my first article … Continue reading
Weekly Summaries Feb 5
Links: • Tobias Buckell tells how he got his freelance career started. • Dvorak update: I know all my letters and lots of punctuation. Friday afternoon I made the switch entirely. I type verrrry slowly now; it’s annoying, but I … Continue reading
Random Links
•The New York Times reviews companies that sell term papers. EDIT: Sorry, this turned pay-to-read between the time I read it and the time I posted it. A quick summary – most papers aren’t worth the money. • Via sartorias, … Continue reading
A Note on the Lack of Paragraphs
For some reason, when I edit posts imported from LiveJournal, WordPress kills all the paragraphing and I can’t put it back in.
Chair
It’s so nice to see a good plan work out.
Members of rec.arts.sf.composition have dedicated an auditorium chair at the Minneapolis Central Library to Patricia C. Wrede, who’s provided us with an incredible amount of advice over the years.
Pat’s post is here. Beth Friedman managed to surprise her with the news, and tells the story here. With photos. Thanks to
mjlayman for coming up with and organizing the whole project.
This seems like a good place to mention that I’ve syndicated rasfc as
rasfc_feed. It’s a pretty useless thing to have done, except for the odd night when you get home and open your friends page and see that Pat got her chair. Continue reading
Genius, Science Blogs, and News Decay
In Wired, Daniel H. Pink’s “What Kind of Genius Are You?” discusses an economist’s study of artists and the ages at which they created their best-known works. David Galenson found that some did their best work when young, and then faded away, while others plodded onward and only met with great success later in life.
What he has found is that genius – whether in art or architecture or even business – is not the sole province of 17-year-old Picassos and 22-year-old Andreessens. Instead, it comes in two very different forms, embodied by two very different types of people. “Conceptual innovators,” as Galenson calls them, make bold, dramatic leaps in their disciplines. They do their breakthrough work when they are young. Think Edvard Munch, Herman Melville, and Orson Welles. They make the rest of us feel like also-rans. Then there’s a second character type, someone who’s just as significant but trudging by comparison. Galenson calls this group “experimental innovators.” Geniuses like Auguste Rodin, Mark Twain, and Alfred Hitchcock proceed by a lifetime of trial and error and thus do their important work much later in their careers. Galenson maintains that this duality – conceptualists are from Mars, experimentalists are from Venus – is the core of the creative process. And it applies to virtually every field of intellectual endeavor, from painters and poets to economists.
There are some problems with his dichotomy, of course (some of the early-bloomers died early being one of the biggest), but the article does a good job of pointing them out. I would have liked to see a clearer link between the *type* of innovaters – conceptual vs experimental – and the age at which they innovate. Most of the examples are from art history, which I’m unfamiliar with, so I can’t judge the accuracy of breakthroughs in concept versus more gradual ideas.
Nature lists the top-ranked science blogs. None of them are about materials science, but I’ll post the link anyway.
Anyone know of any materials science blogs?
From PhysicsWeb, a report on the study of the decay of news on the web.
The average half-life of a news item is just 36 hours, or one and a half days after it is released. While this is short, it is longer than predicted by simple exponential models, which assume that web page browsing is less random than it actually is.
The short life of a news item — combined with random visiting patterns of readers — implies that people could miss a significant fraction of news by not visiting the portal when a new document is first displayed, which is why publishers like to provide e-mail news alerts.
One could argue that if users aren’t hunting for the news they’re missing, they didn’t really need to know about it in the first place.
And finally, it is International Blog Against Racism Week.
rilina has a roundup of people’s posts on the subject. Continue reading